Solutions to Engage & Involve your Audience

Tag: university of auckland

  • Student Response Systems enable student-centered teaching

    Student Response Systems enable student-centered teaching

    Recently we followed up with Dr Michael Rehm from University of Auckland’s  Business School, on how he uses student response systems such as Xorro Q in his courses.

    According to Michael, the student response system has totally changed education. Traditionally, engagement in a classroom has relied on techniques such as breaking the class into groups and having discussions.  The problem of how to achieve the active participation of every student is either ignored, or addressed through some “forced” method such as picking a student at random to answer a question. Michael feels this “lottery” approach is uncomfortable for everyone, and counter-productive to making class time enjoyable and risk-free for learners.

    How student response systems benefit both educator and learner

    A student  response system such as Xorro-Q helps achieve the active participation of every single person in the class. Using student response systems properly ensures that participants enjoy a rewarding, risk free participative experience.  In these circumstances, students’ feedback on use of student response systems is excellent.

    Because student response systems achieve instant delivery and instant assessment of students’ readiness, they disrupt the previous content-heavy teaching paradigm, replacing it with a leaner, higher value student-responsive approach.  Educators can ask questions instantly and spontaneously, and can automatically assess responses to these.  This assessment can be stored and included in an overall course assessment.  Alternatively, students may be rewarded for participation (as opposed to “correctness” of responses) through a portion of their grades.  Either way, the student response system makes this instant and effortless.

    Although many educators are wary of using student response systems for assessment, this too needs realistic review in today’s context.  Historically, setting and grading assessments is an onerous task for educators, while sitting them presents a fearsome hurdle for learners.  By using student response systems, frequent low-stakes assessments become an easily integrated (and even enjoyable!) part of the learning experience

    Since students are digital natives, they are already very comfortable bringing and using their own devices in class.  This makes it easy to implement student response systems, in comparison to previous years when distributing and using clickers presented logistical and financial challenges.

    Experience in  a blended learning model

    Michael has been using student response systems in undergraduate courses since 2012. He has converted his teaching to an online blended learning model, with all lectures accessible online. These supporting materials are highly interactive, including embedded quizzes and links to supplementary materials on Youtube, etc.  Students are expected to go through these materials in their own time.  This leaves the face to face tutorial sessions to focus on student-led needs and extensions. These tutorials can also be attended by online participants, and are enabled by a real-time student response system.

    The tutorials begin with quizzes to determine the group’s requirements.  Michael uses the student response system to deliver these quizzes to all participants.  Delivery is instant, as is assessment.  The areas requiring tutorial focus are easily identified.  Michael has been using Xorro Q and TopHat for this purpose.

    Michael observes that Xorro-Q makes quizzes more fun by exploiting competition among students.  Michael’s careful use of  Xorro-Q’s “Not Yet Answered” panel can display the names of students not answering questions, and in this way deliver a gentle reminder that participation is an essential and expected part of learning in Michael’s courses.

    Challenge = Opportunity for educators

    Although Michael finds Student Response systems very beneficial for the students, there remains a significant challenge. The benefit for learning is proven, however educators need to be motivated to make use of the new opportunity to add more value in face-to-face teaching.  Being responsive and adaptable requires re-learning how to interact valuably with large groups in live sessions.  This in turn stretches the time and resources available to educators and faculty administrators.

     

    Help yourself to a free limited user license for Xorro-Q, or contact Xorro to request a free trial license.

  • Interns Prepare Course Content in Xorro-Q

    Interns Prepare Course Content in Xorro-Q

    This summer, the University of Auckland Department of Civil Engineering has supplied eight student interns to work with Xorro on developing a targeted learning solution.  These interns have been working alongside another intern group (numbering seven) from Massey University contributing to product development in Xorro Workboook and Xorro-Q projects.

    Engineering interns lift the grade

    The Engineering interns had just finished their second year.  They were drawn from a large cohort of students who had been using Xorro-Q as a practice based learning tool in introductory structures.  The focus of the internship at Xorro has been to improve course content, making use of the students’ own experiences and feedback to provide an even better outcome for next year’s course.

    Lecturer Dr James Lim introduced the use of Xorro-Q to the structures courses because he felt there was a need to evolve a more intuitive understanding of the core concepts.  By introducing these concepts individually through working problems, the students can experience their use first hand.  Students can safely experiment with the concepts through responses in Xorro-Q and, by repetitive experience, evolve a practice-based understanding of the behaviour of structures.

    Intern feedback:

    Interns Awal and Sophie describe their work this summer as follows:

    “The questions are now quite diverse so I believe there will be a wider range of understanding. The feedback [has  improved with more comprehensive and detailed solutions provided, rather than just saying whether the answer is right or wrong. ” (Awal)

    Sophie adds: “We have … targeted the questions to explore weaknesses in the understanding of basic material….. and have tried to provide as much detail as necessary for each question to clarify confusions. The detailed feedbacks in the questions should be helpful to students who are struggling to understand ideas…”

    Awal sums it up:

    I’ve always thought [Xorro-Q] was a good program to use and working with the team has solidified my views.  [Xorro-Q] made me think in a more abstract way rather than just using number crunching methods to solve problems.  I believe [this kind of conceptual thinking]  is an important attribute to an engineer.”

    By leveraging the use of Xorro-Q through the interns’ efforts to improve learning content, Dr Lim expects that the 2016 cohort will avoid the conceptual challenges around learning beam theory which were experienced by earlier years.

    If you are interested in contributing student interns to work at Xorro-Q developing content for your courses, please contact us.

    Start using Xorro-Q for free today

    See the video tour.